<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Making Electric Guitars That Won&#8217;t Break Your Back</title> <atom:link href="http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=guitar-building-making-electric-guitars</link> <description>Guitar Designs. Ergonomics. Guitar Making.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Rachel</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-19072</link> <dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-19072</guid> <description><![CDATA[Try Music Man guitars. I think they could work for jazz and they are quite light weight. I have an Axis Sport and it is about 6 pounds and well balanced. It did cost about $1,300, but it plays very well.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Music Man guitars. I think they could work for jazz and they are quite light weight. I have an Axis Sport and it is about 6 pounds and well balanced. It did cost about $1,300, but it plays very well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cole</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-18876</link> <dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-18876</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hello,
I am currently seeing a physical therapist who is helping me with my RSI.  She says my Les Paul has got to go.  Can you recommend any quality guitars for playing Jazz under a thousand dollars that won&#039;t kill my back?
My PT says that my heavy guitar has caused me to hold my guitar improperly causing strain in my wrists, hands, and shoulders.
Thank you!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I am currently seeing a physical therapist who is helping me with my RSI.  She says my Les Paul has got to go.  Can you recommend any quality guitars for playing Jazz under a thousand dollars that won&#8217;t kill my back?</p><p>My PT says that my heavy guitar has caused me to hold my guitar improperly causing strain in my wrists, hands, and shoulders.</p><p>Thank you!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DAVID LESAK</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-18668</link> <dc:creator>DAVID LESAK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-18668</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi there, this thread is very interesting. I am currently looking for a luthier based in Europe (I am presently based in Spain) to make me a chambered or hollow body for a Steinberger 5 bolt neck. I intend using the next incarnation of Ola Strandberg&#039;s EGS tremolo bridge. I could use some advice too please regarding materials. Incidentally, I am also interested in using carbon fibre, perhaps with a maple top. Thank you for any advice in advance.
David]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, this thread is very interesting. I am currently looking for a luthier based in Europe (I am presently based in Spain) to make me a chambered or hollow body for a Steinberger 5 bolt neck. I intend using the next incarnation of Ola Strandberg&#8217;s EGS tremolo bridge. I could use some advice too please regarding materials. Incidentally, I am also interested in using carbon fibre, perhaps with a maple top. Thank you for any advice in advance.</p><p>David</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob Irizarry</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-16817</link> <dc:creator>Rob Irizarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:56:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-16817</guid> <description><![CDATA[Light body woods are certainly a way to achieve it. But as your example highlights, using these approaches with conventional body types come with its problems.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light body woods are certainly a way to achieve it. But as your example highlights, using these approaches with conventional body types come with its problems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terry Coye</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-16815</link> <dc:creator>Terry Coye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-16815</guid> <description><![CDATA[Very light body woods are a choice too, aren&#039;t they?  Rondo is selling a Douglas strat-style made of Phoenix Tree (Paulownia) that is less than 6 pounds.  Reviews suggest it is neck-heavy with a strap, though balanced on your lap.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very light body woods are a choice too, aren&#8217;t they?  Rondo is selling a Douglas strat-style made of Phoenix Tree (Paulownia) that is less than 6 pounds.  Reviews suggest it is neck-heavy with a strap, though balanced on your lap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Irizarry</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-13392</link> <dc:creator>Robert Irizarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:52:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-13392</guid> <description><![CDATA[@Marc - Glad you found this useful. I don&#039;t have a lot of data on the chambered Gibsons but the talk I&#039;ve heard on forums seems generally positive.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marc &#8211; Glad you found this useful. I don&#8217;t have a lot of data on the chambered Gibsons but the talk I&#8217;ve heard on forums seems generally positive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-13369</link> <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:09:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-13369</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is very informative, since I have a bad back as well. I guess chambered guitars will be the norm soon, especially with Gibson. In a way it&#039;s a bit disturbing that the company can&#039;t pick out naturally medium-lightweight mahogany bodies for the newer Les Pauls, and have resorted to chambering most of their solidbody guitars. I have 2 &#039;78 Les Paul Customs, and they&#039;re both a little over 8 Pounds.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very informative, since I have a bad back as well. I guess chambered guitars will be the norm soon, especially with Gibson. In a way it&#8217;s a bit disturbing that the company can&#8217;t pick out naturally medium-lightweight mahogany bodies for the newer Les Pauls, and have resorted to chambering most of their solidbody guitars. I have 2 &#8217;78 Les Paul Customs, and they&#8217;re both a little over 8 Pounds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tyler</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-12807</link> <dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:35:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-12807</guid> <description><![CDATA[i was looking, and i realized that my guitar is light and wondered why you would need a lighter one. but then i realized its good for people with back injuries, and disabilities, thats awesome~!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was looking, and i realized that my guitar is light and wondered why you would need a lighter one. but then i realized its good for people with back injuries, and disabilities, thats awesome~!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven Clements</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-10036</link> <dc:creator>Steven Clements</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-10036</guid> <description><![CDATA[A friend of mine has a Kramer Bass it&#039;s one of the aluminum neck era ran from 1976 to 1985... it&#039;s the only neck heavy guitar I&#039;ve ever had the displeasure to play.  Nice tone but hard to play sitting or standing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine has a Kramer Bass it&#8217;s one of the aluminum neck era ran from 1976 to 1985&#8230; it&#8217;s the only neck heavy guitar I&#8217;ve ever had the displeasure to play.  Nice tone but hard to play sitting or standing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Irizarry</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-6599</link> <dc:creator>Robert Irizarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:58:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-6599</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused by your comment. &quot;Neck heavy&quot; references poor balance and most guitars do not balance well - especially in a sitting position. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by your comment. &#8220;Neck heavy&#8221; references poor balance and most guitars do not balance well &#8211; especially in a sitting position.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: soothsayer</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-6575</link> <dc:creator>soothsayer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-6575</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well, unless the neck is made of stone, I would say do nothing.  I have yet to see a neck heavy guitar.   In fact my lightest body guitar, a hollowbody es-335 style, is completely balanced in the middle.  Meaning I can balance it with one finger where the neck and body meet.  I cant imagine a guitar body being lighter.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, unless the neck is made of stone, I would say do nothing.  I have yet to see a neck heavy guitar.   In fact my lightest body guitar, a hollowbody es-335 style, is completely balanced in the middle.  Meaning I can balance it with one finger where the neck and body meet.  I cant imagine a guitar body being lighter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stratoblogster</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-209</link> <dc:creator>Stratoblogster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-209</guid> <description><![CDATA[I really like the Warmoth chambered body. A builder told me you have to be careful making basses though, because they can easily be neck heavy.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the Warmoth chambered body. A builder told me you have to be careful making basses though, because they can easily be neck heavy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ray DeGennaro</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-210</link> <dc:creator>Ray DeGennaro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-210</guid> <description><![CDATA[Regarding Eric&#039;s comment:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;From a purely statics point of view, just chamber the areas that would add to the torque from the neck and not chamber areas that would counteract that torque. How to do that without negatively affecting the playability or tone of the guitar requires the &quot;holistics&quot; that Robert mentions.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;To me, that just begs the question: How would moving the controls from the traditional &quot;six o&#039;clock&quot; position to the &quot;two o&#039;clock&quot; position affect the tone? That would move one body cavity that adds to the neck torque to a position that would reduce this torque. So far, the only disadvantages I&#039;ve thought of would be the additional long route for the cable socket and that it&#039;s just &quot;different&quot;. One&#039;s real and the other is &quot;real enough&quot; because people may have a problem with the controls being someplace different.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Eric&#8217;s comment:</p><p>From a purely statics point of view, just chamber the areas that would add to the torque from the neck and not chamber areas that would counteract that torque. How to do that without negatively affecting the playability or tone of the guitar requires the &#8220;holistics&#8221; that Robert mentions.</p><p>To me, that just begs the question: How would moving the controls from the traditional &#8220;six o&#8217;clock&#8221; position to the &#8220;two o&#8217;clock&#8221; position affect the tone? That would move one body cavity that adds to the neck torque to a position that would reduce this torque. So far, the only disadvantages I&#8217;ve thought of would be the additional long route for the cable socket and that it&#8217;s just &#8220;different&#8221;. One&#8217;s real and the other is &#8220;real enough&#8221; because people may have a problem with the controls being someplace different.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Governor Silver</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-213</link> <dc:creator>Governor Silver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-213</guid> <description><![CDATA[Robert,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Thank you so much for starting and maintaining this blog.  I&#039;m recovering from a low-back injury myself and have found the info to be very useful.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p><p>Thank you so much for starting and maintaining this blog.  I&#8217;m recovering from a low-back injury myself and have found the info to be very useful.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Irizarry</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-211</link> <dc:creator>Robert Irizarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-211</guid> <description><![CDATA[Governor - Welcome to BTEG! I&#039;m very happy to hear that the information has been of benefit. As you may have read, I&#039;ve suffered from RSI and prior to that, many years of chronic back pain. Much of the back pain is gone and I&#039;ve managed to bring much of the RSI under control but these are issues that I will always concern myself with. I&#039;m glad the blog can be of help to you as well.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor &#8211; Welcome to BTEG! I&#8217;m very happy to hear that the information has been of benefit. As you may have read, I&#8217;ve suffered from RSI and prior to that, many years of chronic back pain. Much of the back pain is gone and I&#8217;ve managed to bring much of the RSI under control but these are issues that I will always concern myself with. I&#8217;m glad the blog can be of help to you as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Irizarry</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-212</link> <dc:creator>Robert Irizarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-212</guid> <description><![CDATA[Guitar design with the goal of improved ergonomics requires a holistic approach, as your question suggests. My purpose in writing this particular article is to illustrate the possibilities in addressing just one of the major concerns in an ergonomic guitar design. To truly succeed, a design must take more than just this one element into account.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To accomplish this, we have to challenge ourselves to look beyond convention which is an underlying theme of my blog. Headless designs, for example, lend themselves very well to improving overall balance. The Klein design, already two decades old, went even further to address ergonomics. Yet when we think about guitars, designs that are a half century old come to mind - the Strat and the Les Paul, in particular.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, I am not suggesting that headless designs are the only solution. New visions of the shape of the guitar can improve balance while still retaining the headstock that many prefer. Take a look at my article on Adrian Legg&#039;s guitar for one such example. Although it is in many ways a variation of the Klein theme which in turn is a variation on the Ovation Breadwinner, it retains the conventional headstock but in a smaller format. This, in turn, reduces some of the lever effect of the neck.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A natural follow up to this article, btw, is a discussion of considerations for improving instrument balance. Keep an eye out for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the comment and welcome!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guitar design with the goal of improved ergonomics requires a holistic approach, as your question suggests. My purpose in writing this particular article is to illustrate the possibilities in addressing just one of the major concerns in an ergonomic guitar design. To truly succeed, a design must take more than just this one element into account.</p><p>To accomplish this, we have to challenge ourselves to look beyond convention which is an underlying theme of my blog. Headless designs, for example, lend themselves very well to improving overall balance. The Klein design, already two decades old, went even further to address ergonomics. Yet when we think about guitars, designs that are a half century old come to mind &#8211; the Strat and the Les Paul, in particular.</p><p>However, I am not suggesting that headless designs are the only solution. New visions of the shape of the guitar can improve balance while still retaining the headstock that many prefer. Take a look at my article on Adrian Legg&#8217;s guitar for one such example. Although it is in many ways a variation of the Klein theme which in turn is a variation on the Ovation Breadwinner, it retains the conventional headstock but in a smaller format. This, in turn, reduces some of the lever effect of the neck.</p><p>A natural follow up to this article, btw, is a discussion of considerations for improving instrument balance. Keep an eye out for it.</p><p>Thanks for the comment and welcome!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eric</title><link>http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars.html#comment-214</link> <dc:creator>eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://buildingtheergonomicguitar.com/2007/03/05/guitar-building-making-electric-guitars/#comment-214</guid> <description><![CDATA[With the guitar body consisting of more air and less wood, what do you do to balance the instruments weight to avoid a guitar that is neck heavy?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the guitar body consisting of more air and less wood, what do you do to balance the instruments weight to avoid a guitar that is neck heavy?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>